
"It wouldn't be a proper Apple release without a design controversy. After antennagate, bendgate and butterfly keyboardgate (OK, that doesn't quite have the ring to it), Apple now faces iPhone 17 scratchgate, and its attempts to dismiss the problem aren't convincing people. On the very same day that the new iPhone was released, there were reports that the range is prone to scratching, and that it's particularly notable on the Pro after the tech giant's decision to move back to aluminium from titanium."
"After antennagate, bendgate and butterfly keyboardgate (OK, that doesn't quite have the ring to it), Apple now faces iPhone 17 scratchgate, and its attempts to dismiss the problem aren't convincing people. On the very same day that the new iPhone was released, there were reports that the range is prone to scratching, and that it's particularly notable on the Pro after the tech giant's decision to move back to aluminium from titanium. According to Apple, it's just 'material transfer'."
The iPhone 17 lineup has shown notable susceptibility to surface scratching, with reports emerging on release day. The issue appears particularly pronounced on the Pro model after Apple returned from titanium to aluminium construction. Users posted visible scuffs and marks that some describe as more than typical wear. Apple characterizes the visible marks as 'material transfer' rather than damage to the finish. Consumers and observers remain unconvinced by that explanation given the premium price and the apparent visibility of scratches. Many buyers are advised to use protective cases to prevent or hide surface abrasions on the new models.
Read at Creative Bloq
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]