Karen Read's murder retrial continues with critical testimonies, particularly from defense expert Dr. Marie Russell. On Tuesday, Russell faced intense cross-examination by prosecutor Hank Brennan regarding her findings that John O'Keefe's injuries were from a dog attack, contradicting the prosecution's claims that he was deliberately hit by Read's SUV. Despite pressure, Russell maintained her stance, asserting no significant medical evidence suggests O'Keefe's injuries were vehicle-related. The case raises questions around Read's guilt and whether she was framed, with a mix of forensic analysis and conflicting narratives.
"A broken taillight, in and of itself, could not cause those injuries," Russell told jurors, adding, "A broken taillight could not have done that."
"I saw no medical evidence that there was impact with a vehicle," Russell testified, reinforcing the defense's argument that the injuries were not caused by a vehicle.
Collection
[
|
...
]