A group of brokers who recently left Eastdil for Newmark is facing a lawsuit from their former employer, who claims they stole trade secrets. The court denied Eastdil's request for a temporary restraining order, suggesting it failed to demonstrate any significant risk of harm. The brokers countered Eastdilâs actions as an illegal enforcement of noncompetes, which violate California law, commonly allowing for continued engagement with ongoing deals. Central to the conflict are disputes over commission expectations on deals, where perceived unfair terms contributed to the brokersâ departure.
Eastdil's lawsuit against former brokers is seen as an illegal attempt to enforce noncompete clauses and suppress competition while raising questions about its intentions.
The Orange County judge denied Eastdil's request for a temporary restraining order, indicating that the brokerage failed to prove significant harm during the litigation.
Brokers argue that Eastdilâs actions constitute a noncompete, which is illegal in California, highlighting industry norms for transitioning between firms.
The dispute revolves around financial disagreements, particularly the perceived unfairness of Eastdil's commission demands on deals after the brokers' departure.
Collection
[
|
...
]