"Rather than let assets collapse and take money from the owners and give advantage back to the earners, we're going to pull out your credit card and ensure, in the form of debt and stimulus, that I stay rich. The reason I'm economically secure goes back to the 2008 collapse. Yes, the government bailed out the banks, but they let the markets collapse, and as a result I got to buy stock in Apple, Amazon, and Netflix for between $8 to $12 per share each."
"At some point, we have to stop propping up the markets with young people's credit cards. The Dow and the S&P are not indicators of economic health. They are effectively a proxy for how the rich are doing. And spoiler alert—they're doing really well."
Scott Galloway argues that for 40 years, U.S. government interventions during economic crises have prioritized protecting assets and wealthy owners rather than workers. Each bailout—from the dot-com crash to COVID—has transferred debt to younger generations while allowing the wealthy to accumulate assets at discounted prices. Galloway personally benefited from the 2008 collapse by purchasing stocks in Apple, Amazon, and Netflix at historically low prices. He contends that stock market indices like the Dow and S&P 500 function as proxies for wealth concentration among the rich rather than indicators of genuine economic health. This systemic inequity explains Gen Z's skepticism toward traditional equities and their attraction to alternative investments including prediction markets, meme stocks, and cryptocurrency.
#generational-wealth-inequality #government-economic-intervention #alternative-investments #market-manipulation #gen-z-financial-skepticism
Read at Fortune
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]