The article discusses the complexities faced by higher education leaders when expressing public statements about academic freedom. The author reflects on signing a statement from the AAC&U that condemns government overreach affecting higher education. Faced with criticism from an alum who disagrees with the stance, the author demonstrates constructive engagement, highlighting recent positive initiatives on campus. This narrative underscores the tension between institutional values and differing perspectives within the university community, advocating for a balanced approach to academic governance.
"The statement speaks out against 'the unprecedented government overreach and political interference now endangering American higher education.' It calls for academic freedom in admissions and teaching."
"Deciding whether to make such a public statement merits careful consideration, as a higher education leader will likely not reflect all constituents' viewpoints."
"I opted to reply to our alum, thereby putting to practice the constructive engagement preached by the AAC&U statement."
"I asked the alum whether he had heard of the Common Ground program instituted in 2018, which fosters dialogue and understanding among diverse groups on campus."
Collection
[
|
...
]