"It's always best to take a sceptical view of the constant flow of BBC-bashing newspaper stories, which are often simply bogus outrage expressed for commercial gain. Even the war-on-woke, cod-ideological stuff Clive Myrie INSISTS hamsters can breastfeed human robots the bits that make you want to smear your face with greengage jam and weep for England, our England, with its meadows, its shadows, its curates made entirely from beef."
"Basically, it's the licence fee. The BBC is free at the point of delivery, but paid for by a national levy. The BBC is also a direct commercial competitor to every other form of legacy media, all of which are trying to find ways to survive and recoup revenue. There is a logical financial incentive to attack this profit-sapping freesheet, which is then rolled over into the generally polarised and hysterical nature of all public discourse."
"It can make for some confusing moments, as it did this week when the great Jeff Powell of the Daily Mail announced that he was glad John Motson and Brian Moore are dead. Jeff Powell is glad about this because the BBC has gathered up her skirts and decided to hide behind them for most of next summer's World Cup. And yes, it is hard to untangle this at first glance."
Newspaper attacks on the BBC often reflect manufactured outrage driven by commercial incentives rather than genuine critique. The BBC is funded by a national licence fee, creating direct competition with legacy media that must recoup revenue. Rival outlets have a financial motive to portray the BBC as a profit-sapping freesheet and to inflame public sentiment. Tabloid commentators sometimes escalate that rhetoric into personal attacks and grotesque imagery, tying institutional decisions to sensational claims. The result is a polarized and hysterical public discourse that confuses accountability with commercial self-interest and undermines rational debate about broadcasting policy.
Read at www.theguardian.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]