Next generation M5 powered iPad Pro 13 stars in unboxing video, gets compared to its predecessor
Briefly

Next generation M5 powered iPad Pro 13 stars in unboxing video, gets compared to its predecessor
"Apple is expected to release some new iPads soon, perhaps in October. So we're clearly at least a few weeks away from their official debut. That, however, hasn't stopped one Russian YouTuber from presenting the M5 powered iPad Pro in the video you can see embedded below. It's in Russian, of course, but if you have access to YouTube's auto-dubbing feature, do try it - it's surprisingly good,"
"The M5 iPad Pro will ship in an identical box to that used by the M4 iPad Pro. This is the 13" version here, with 256GB of storage. There will also be the same colors and the same screen size - cases for the 2024 iPad Pro will fit the new one, even. So it looks like the M5 chip will be the main update to the iPad Pro line this time around. The iPad is still made from aluminum, unsurprisingly."
"It managed a single-core score of 4,133 and a multi-core score of 15,437. The former represents a 10% improvement over its predecessor's 3,748 score, the latter a 15% improvement over last year's model. According to the benchmark's listing, the L2 cache has increased by 50%, but not much else has changed, there are still 9 CPU cores. The 2025 model does get 12GB of RAM compared to 8GB in its predecessor's 256GB variant, so that's nice."
Apple plans new iPads, likely launching around October, with leaks showing an M5-powered iPad Pro. A Russian YouTuber posted hands-on footage and the device uses the same 13" design, colors, packaging, and aluminum body, maintaining accessory compatibility with 2024 cases. Benchmark results show a single-core Geekbench score of 4,133 (+10%) and multi-core 15,437 (+15%), an L2 cache increase of 50%, and a RAM upgrade to 12GB for the 256GB model. GPU performance improved about 33% in Geekbench, while AnTuTu shows an 8% overall gain despite an anomalously higher CPU score on the older model.
Read at GSMArena.com
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]