"In the realm of housing, the transparency of costs differs significantly between buying and renting. When closing on a home, buyers are presented with detailed disclosures outlining all financial obligations, ensuring a clear understanding of the loan. In contrast, renters often face hidden fees beyond the advertised rent, leading to financial strain and housing instability. Lawmakers in multiple states have taken action to address these "junk fees" in rental agreements, aiming to enhance transparency and fairness for tenants."
"Congressional response post-2008 crisis: Legislation like the Dodd-Frank Act mandated lenders to disclose all fees clearly to borrowers, preventing hidden costs that contributed to the housing collapse. Discrepancy in disclosure: While mortgage agreements have standardized disclosures, rental leases often lack transparency, leaving tenants unaware of additional fees and the total cost of living in a unit. Array of rental fees: A survey revealed 27 types of hidden rental fees, such as application fees, insurance policies, pet fees, and more, complicating rent"
Homebuyers receive standardized, itemized disclosures at closing that list all loan-related charges and provide clear cost expectations. Renters, by contrast, often face numerous additional charges beyond advertised rent—application fees, pet fees, insurance charges and other "junk fees"—that cumulatively increase monthly housing costs and can cause financial strain or displacement. Federal legislation after 2008, such as the Dodd-Frank Act, established disclosure requirements for lenders to prevent hidden costs. State-level lawmakers have begun targeting rental "junk fees" to improve transparency and tenant protections. Surveys have identified over two dozen distinct fee types that complicate rent affordability.
Read at SFGATE
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]