"Today, I choose violence, he wrote. Literally. I know calls for violence are generally frowned upon, he added. The issue is I simply don't care. Ingersoll's argument was that the cost of anti-social and subversive behavior was not high enough, and in his opinion, some of this cost needs to be summary and ultra-violent. The law is not enough, he declared, and reiterated that he was literally calling for violence, writing, Is this a call for violence? Yes. Explicitly it is."
"cheering for the arrest of former NIAID Director Anthony Fauci, adding that he hopes the arrest and adjudication process absolutely ruins them both, lamenting that Steve Bannon went to prison for four months, and calling for the investigation of Ilhan Omar, AOC, Barack Obama, and everyone in Clinton world and putting Biden world through the wringer, he complained about New York County District Attorney Alvin Bragg's office recently dismissing of felony assault charges against a woman who was videoed punching in the face another woman,"
A prominent conservative voice advocated that conservatives should embrace summary, ultra-violent measures against liberals, arguing that current costs for anti-social and subversive behavior are too low. The argument asserted that legal processes are insufficient deterrents and explicitly called for violence as a corrective. The statements celebrated arrests and hoped legal processes would ruin targeted public figures, while urging investigations of progressive politicians and political networks. The statements criticized a district attorney's dismissal of assault charges as evidence of permissive liberal jurisdictions and presented hypothetical scenarios encouraging violent reprisals to reinstitute harsher, extralegal costs for perceived political transgressions.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]