"But many engineering teams are noticing a trend: even as individual developers produce code faster, overall project delivery timelines are not shortening. This isn't just a feeling. A recent METR study found that AI coding assistants decreased experienced software developers' productivity by 19%. "After completing the study, developers estimate that allowing AI reduced completion time by 20%," the report noted. "Surprisingly, we find that allowing AI actually increases completion time by 19%-AI tooling slowed developers down.""
"This growing disconnect reveals a "productivity paradox." We are seeing immense speed gains in one isolated part of the software development life cycle (SDLC), code generation, which in turn exposes and exacerbates bottlenecks in other parts such as code review, integration, and testing. It's a classic factory problem: speed up one machine on an assembly line while leaving the others untouched, and you don't get a faster factory, you get a massive pile-up."
Generative AI dramatically speeds code generation, enabling developers to produce larger volumes of code and more pull requests. Faster code creation is exposing bottlenecks in code review, integration, and testing, preventing overall project timelines from shortening. A METR study found AI coding assistants decreased experienced developers' productivity by 19%, with developers estimating a 20% reduction in completion time yet observing a 19% increase. This creates a productivity paradox where improvements in one SDLC stage cause pile-ups elsewhere. Teams must diagnose these bottlenecks, realign workflows, preserve code quality, and ensure rigorous human review to avoid defects and developer burnout.
Read at InfoWorld
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]