In the aftermath of Survivor 48, Kamilla Karthigesu noted the jury's frustration with the final three contestants, Eva Erickson, Joe Hunter, and Kyle Fraser, indicating the jury was unhappy with their gameplay. Karthigesu explained that while she and Fraser believed sitting next to the least favorable contestants could increase their chances of winning, the jury resented the lack of strategy discussions. This highlighted a disconnect between the finalist's perceived integrity and the reality of the game's competitive nature, emphasizing the complexity of alliances and decision-making during the season.
"People were just unhappy with everyone. To be honest, they didn't like anyone sitting at the end. I think people were the least upset about Kyle."
"Some people in the big alliance didn't have any conversations with people outside of it, didn't have any strategy conversations with people outside of it."
"And then there was this other aspect of going around parading honesty and integrity, but you do have to eliminate people. And how do you call that honesty and integrity?"
"I think it might have been around either the Shauhin vote or at final five. We never said let's make that person the winner."
Collection
[
|
...
]