The Supreme Court looks poised to ban late mail ballots ahead of the midterms | Fortune
Briefly

The Supreme Court looks poised to ban late mail ballots ahead of the midterms | Fortune
"Justice Sonia Sotomayor stated, 'The people who should decide this issue are not the courts, but Congress, the states and Congress,' emphasizing the need for legislative rather than judicial resolution."
"Mississippi Solicitor General Scott Stewart highlighted that the Trump administration has not provided any evidence of fraud linked to late-arriving mail ballots, countering claims of widespread fraud."
"Justice Samuel Alito raised concerns about the appearance of fraud, questioning the legitimacy of elections that could be 'radically flipped' by a late influx of ballots."
"Election officials warned that forcing states to alter their practices shortly before elections could lead to 'confusion and disenfranchisement,' particularly in states with established relaxed deadlines."
The court is reviewing a Mississippi case that may influence mail ballot grace periods in 13 states and D.C., as well as deadlines for military and overseas voters in 15 additional states. A decision is anticipated by late June, affecting the 2026 midterm elections. The case is part of a broader challenge to mail voting, with conservative justices expressing concerns about potential fraud, while liberal justices advocate for state law protections. Election officials warn against last-minute changes that could lead to confusion and disenfranchisement.
Read at Fortune
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]