Rupert Murdoch's decision to settle a $10-billion lawsuit by Donald Trump against The Wall Street Journal raises concerns about the implications for his legacy. The lawsuit follows a story related to Jeffrey Epstein published by the Journal. A settlement could undermine the paper's reputation for free speech and ethical journalism. The Journal aims to model influential news reporting and inspires aspiring journalists. Historical precedents demonstrate that courageous stands against powerful individuals bolster journalistic integrity and freedom of expression.
The Journal's global standing as a paradigm of journalistic excellence that has earned many Pulitzers will take a hit if you prioritize profit over the ideal of free speech.
Besides, many small publications look to major media conglomerates such as yours to fight intimidation and shakedowns by people in power.
The present generation of journalists benefits from the struggles of their earlier generation to uphold their rights.
In 1961, the court ruled in favor of The New York Times, stating that 'debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust and open.'
Collection
[
|
...
]