The article discusses key judicial rulings featured on Howard Bashman's How Appealing blog, focusing on a recent Supreme Court ruling affirming equal treatment in employment discrimination cases for majority groups. A federal judge also mandated the Trump administration to improve due process for deported migrants, emphasizing legal fairness. Furthermore, Trump aired grievances about his Supreme Court nominees, reflecting his complex relationship with the judiciary. The roundup also mentions the new episode of the "Strict Scrutiny" podcast, which delves into these legal developments and their implications.
The Supreme Court's ruling clarifies that members of majority groups do not need to meet a heightened burden of proof in employment discrimination cases, reinforcing equal treatment.
A federal judge's ruling orders the Trump administration to ensure that deported migrants receive proper due process, asserting that their expulsion may have been unfair.
Trump has expressed private dissatisfaction regarding his Supreme Court nominees, highlighting the complexities of judicial expectations versus political realities.
The 'Strict Scrutiny' podcast provides insights into recent judicial decisions, analyzing how they impact legal practices and public sentiment.
Collection
[
|
...
]