"Yes, it's a war crime. It's whatever. It's what we do. It's December. It's the holidays. No, it's just what we're going to do. There's a decision made to just start bombing, began Dillion, who is popular on the MAGA right. He added: We need to start, but something's got to get bombed. I mean, truly, when the Epstein stuff's going down and all this stuff is going down, someone up there goes, We need to start bombing someone like now. We need to pivot people's attention from the economy and the pedophile ring we're covering up to Venezuela. Let's start blowing up boats. Who cares? They're narco terrorists. Great. We'll blow them up. And it'll pivot."
"And even this is good. Even this, like, war crime thing is good because what this allows is everyone can fight about this. It's justI've lived through this forever. I'm sorry that I'm notI don't feel any way about it. I mean, you can't day in and day out, you can't consume this stuff and still care. There's no way to do it at 40. You'd have to be so crazy. You'd have to be so crazy at 40 to still have an emotional investment in that. It's just what it is. We're just blowing upbut this is what happens here. Have you not lived here? Are you new? Are you five? We're blowing stuff up."
U.S. bombings of drug-smuggling boats in the Caribbean reportedly killed more than 80 people. A popular MAGA-aligned podcaster claimed the strikes were intended to divert public attention from economic troubles and revelations tied to Jeffrey Epstein. Defense Secretary directives allegedly included a second strike targeting survivors, an act that meets the legal definition of a war crime under U.S. law. The podcaster portrayed the bombings as a calculated pivot by leadership to change the news cycle and suggested public desensitization to repeated violent actions by the government.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]