The Trump administration plans to eliminate the endangerment finding that identifies greenhouse gases as harmful to health. Rescinding this finding would revoke the legal authority to limit emissions under the Clean Air Act, potentially increasing pollution from various sources. This move challenges significant scientific consensus on the dangers of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. Experts assert that the connections between extreme weather events and climate change stress the need to address emissions rather than dispute their adverse effects.
The Trump administration's proposed rule aims to rescind the endangerment finding, undermining the government's legal authority to limit greenhouse gases essential for addressing the climate crisis.
Removing the endangerment finding would dismantle limits on pollution from cars, trucks, and power plants, exacerbating the dangerous heating of the planet.
Jason Burnett emphasized that the harm caused by greenhouse gases is undeniable, supported by accelerating temperatures and extreme weather events since 2009.
The challenge should focus on reducing emissions instead of debating the existence of climate issues, as both science and impacts are now even more evident.
Collection
[
|
...
]