"CGMs are fantastic tools for people with diabetes, but their relevance and accuracy for non-diabetics are questionable given the recent findings about overestimations."
"The study highlighted that continuous glucose monitors overestimated blood sugar levels by 30% in non-diabetic subjects, raising concerns about their necessity for health-conscious individuals."
A recent study has found that continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) overestimate blood sugar levels in non-diabetic individuals, potentially undermining their reliability for this population. Conducted by the University of Bath, the research compared CGM data with the traditional finger prick test among 15 non-diabetics, revealing a consistent 30% overestimation after fruit consumption. While CGMs are effective for individuals with diabetes, their increasing popularity among non-diabetics has drawn scrutiny, especially since the FDA has approved them for over-the-counter sale. Experts advise that CGMs may not be necessary for those who can regulate their blood sugar naturally.
Read at Business Insider
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]