Stop the 'good' vs 'bad' snap judgments and watch your world become more interesting
Briefly

The article discusses how snap evaluations of experiences as 'good' or 'bad' can inhibit one's ability to appreciate the richness of life. Philosopher examining happiness suggests that this binary thinking narrows focus, leading to missed opportunities for engagement and curiosity. Highlighting an example of viewing clouds, the author illustrates how labeling can obscure other interesting elements around us. In a world increasingly filtered through quick judgments, the article urges individuals to broaden their perspectives for a fuller experience of life.
When you instinctively label something as good or bad, you focus only on the features that make that thing good or bad. You risk missing nuanced experiences.
The more you instinctively react with a 'good' or a 'bad,' the less of the world you take in. You'll be less likely to engage your mind and exercise curiosity.
Read at The Conversation
[
|
]