The article argues that while the Socratic Method is famous for fostering self-examination, it can sometimes alienate individuals due to its confrontational nature. Socrates would often lead discussions towards contradictions, creating a situation where the other party feels defensive instead of engaged. The author suggests that a less adversarial approach might facilitate genuine self-exploration and healing in therapeutic settings, arguing that a supportive dialogue could foster better outcomes than Socratic questioning, which could be seen as a 'gotcha' tactic.
Socrates' approach often left individuals feeling defensive and resentful; a more supportive dialogue style may encourage deeper personal exploration during therapy instead.
The Socratic Method, while thrilling, has drawbacks that can hinder genuine self-exploration in counseling, particularly the potential to alienate rather than engage clients.
Collection
[
|
...
]