#uspto-policy

[ follow ]
#patent-eligibility
fromIPWatchdog.com | Patents & Intellectual Property Law
1 week ago
Intellectual property law

USPTO Reminds Examiners, Applicants to Consider and Use Eligibility Declarations Wisely

USPTO issued guidance clarifying use of patent subject matter eligibility declarations (SMEDs) for applied technologies while leaving existing procedures unchanged.
fromPatently-O
2 months ago
Intellectual property law

Systems Theory, Equilibrium and the New Eligibility Shock

USPTO leadership seeks to broaden patent eligibility via administrative reinterpretation while critics and the Federal Circuit push back amid PERA legislative efforts.
fromPatently-O
4 weeks ago

Shutting the Patent Office Door: YMTC and the Entity List

To be clear, YMTC is not an ordinary China-based company. YMTC reached the Entity List after first being placed on the Unverified List in October 2022 when BIS was unable to complete end-use checks to verify that exported technology was being used as declared. Under President Biden, YMTC was added to the Entity List based on findings that the company creates a major risk of diversion (sharing key technology) with other parties on the entities list, including Huawei and Hangzhou Hikvision.
Intellectual property law
Intellectual property law
fromPatently-O
1 month ago

PTAB Responds to Director Squires with 101 Reversals

In October 2025 the PTAB issued far fewer new Section 101 rejections and reversed examiner 101 rejections at unprecedented rates following USPTO Director interventions.
fromPatently-O
2 months ago

Ultra Vires or Policy Discretion? Federal Circuit Now Weighing 5x Discretionary Denial Mandamus

Two additional mandamus petitions have joined the Federal Circuit's growing docket challenging the USPTO's 2025 shift toward more restrictive inter partes review (IPR) institution practices under President Trump, bringing the total to five pending cases that collectively test the boundaries of appellate review under 35 U.S.C. § 314(d). The newest petitions are In re HighLevel, Inc. (No. 25-148) and In re SanDisk Technologies, Inc. (No. 25-152).
Intellectual property law
[ Load more ]