Intellectual property law

Intellectual property law

Leila Turner-Scott and Angus Scott filed a lawsuit against the company, alleging that it designed and distributed a "defective product" that led to the death of their son Sam Nelson from an accidental overdose. Specifically, they're alleging that Sam died following the "exact medical advice GPT-4o had provided and approved."

Ask a lay person what pH 13 means and you will get a straightforward answer: very basic, near the top of the 14-point scale. Ask a PhD patent attorney in a Hatch-Waxman dispute the same question and the answer becomes: it depends.

Extending the waiver to 2029 will "give the Commission an opportunity to consider a rulemaking on this subject," and reduce "potential harm to the public interest," the FCC engineering office said. The office said it will recommend making the waiver permanent for existing equipment on the Covered List and "any future covered equipment with similar characteristics."

A 'short-and-distort' is the opposite. Short sellers bet that a stock will fall, then deliberately spread false negative information to make that happen. It's illegal. And it's exactly what the SEC and DOJ found was happening.

Fremont-based Innodisk USA has agreed to pay a total of $950,000 to settle allegations that it knowingly violated federal law when it received and retained a Covid-era Paycheck Protection Program loan, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of California announced this week.

What we do is give a work of art an identity card. We can't certify, obviously, whether an older painting was done by Murillo or Velazquez, but we can certify the authorship of new works by whoever registers them and, furthermore, ensure the ownership of existing works.

The ruling affects every stakeholder in the broadband ecosystem: consumers who believed the rules protected them, broadband providers who challenged them, state broadband officials implementing the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program, digital equity practitioners whose advocacy shaped the rules, and the FCC itself, which is now under an explicit court-recognized obligation to start the rulemaking process over.

The motion is based on affirmations submitted by eyewitnesses who have provided firsthand information that will make it clear that Mondex wrongfully identified Seated Man with a Cane as the work that the estate of Oscar Stettiner should be pursuing for restitution.