The article discusses the rising trend of large financial awards in trade secrets litigation, highlighting key cases such as a $452 million award to a medical device company and a $222 million award to Zest Labs against Walmart. It notes that the ability to bring trade secret cases to trial is generally more accessible than patent cases, leading to high win rates for plaintiffs. The Stout 2024 report reveals that 84% of trade secret cases result in wins for plaintiffs, with juries awarding damages in 78% of cases, reflecting the legal emphasis on protecting trade secrets.
Monetary awards in trade secrets cases are increasingly significant with recent jury decisions, showing a growing trend of substantial financial penalties against violators.
The ease of taking trade secret cases to trial compared to patent cases contributes to a higher success rate for plaintiffs in these litigation settings.
Juries have awarded considerable damages in trade secret cases, highlighting the legal system's recognition of the value of protecting proprietary information in business.
The report indicates a favorable litigation environment for trade secret claimants, with impressive trial win rates and jury damages that affirm the seriousness of these cases.
Collection
[
|
...
]