"The former governor has baggage that most voters can recite from memory. But politics isn't about picking saints; it's about survival. And when survival is on the line, sometimes the only responsible thing to do is choose the lesser of two evils.Cuomo may be corrupt, arrogant and heavy-handed. But at least he governs from a place of pragmatism. Mamdani, by contrast, represents the radical left's fantasy of New York City - a city where utopian slogans replace hard choices,"
"That area became infamous for its open-air prostitution scene. It wasn't just an embarrassment - it was a full-scale community crisis. Families couldn't walk their own streets without being confronted by sex work, drug dealing and human trafficking.To his credit, Eric Adams at least tried to clean it up. Under Zohran Mamdani's vision for New York, that problem wouldn't just return - it would multiply."
New York City voters face a stark choice between Andrew Cuomo and Zohran Mamdani after Eric Adams exited the mayoral race. Cuomo is described as corrupt and arrogant but pragmatic and experienced in governance. Mamdani is presented as aligned with the radical left and likely to prioritize ideological goals over hard choices, fiscal responsibility, and public safety. The Roosevelt "Market of Sweethearts" example is cited as a consequence of permissive policies, with open-air prostitution, drug dealing, and human trafficking harming families and neighborhoods. The argument favors pragmatic leadership to stop community decline and preserve safety.
Read at The Spectator World
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]