Shaming Someone Isn't the Same as Holding Them Accountable
Briefly

Shaming Someone Isn't the Same as Holding Them Accountable
"Shaming is an ancient form of social control. Though more democratic in our times, it remains inherently hierarchical; we feel morally or intellectually superior to those we shame."
"Shaming typically has the opposite effect of what the shamer wants. It narrows identity, distorts moral understanding, and either perpetuates injustice or substitutes one form of injustice for another."
"In terms of psychological function, shaming is less reaction than preemptive judgment. The brain's penchant for tacit and snap judgments is how shaming generalizes from individuals to groups."
Shaming is a historical form of social control that asserts moral superiority and is often biased. It aims to silence disagreement and can lead to a mob mentality on social media. Those who shame others may struggle with imposter syndrome. Shaming attacks the human desire for belonging and respect, labeling individuals and groups in a way that distorts identity and moral understanding. It creates a self-fulfilling prophecy, implying permanence in negative labels and failing to recognize human complexity.
Read at Psychology Today
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]