How I cut down stakeholder rework with better UX storytelling - LogRocket Blog
Briefly

How I cut down stakeholder rework with better UX storytelling - LogRocket Blog
"I used to leave design presentations with a stack of changes and a heavy heart. Over 20 points to revise was normal. Most of the feedback wasn't from users; it was subjective opinions from stakeholders. Nothing felt anchored. I'd rush through the screens, hoping the room wouldn't ask hard questions. Then I learned to stop just showing screens and start telling the story behind them. The result was immediate: clearer conversations, fewer rounds of rework, faster buy-in, and designs that actually reflected user needs."
"Most stakeholder feedback isn't malicious; it's social. People feel the need to contribute in a meeting. A team lead says, "I don't love these cards," and others echo them to show alignment. Without structure, one offhand comment becomes a cascade of edits. When dozens of people have opinions, traditional ad-hoc strategies break down. That's why structure matters: it transforms disconnected opinions into focused, evidence-backed discussion."
"My wake-up moment was watching a senior design lead present. He didn't open with a mockup. He walked the room through: A short UX audit and competitor review Real usability tests and qualitative quotes A/B results that proved one direction performed better His narrative followed a clean arc: Context 14 Evidence 14 Insight 14 Design 14 Business impact. Because every choice was tied to research, stakeholders stopped debating styles and started discussing trade-offs."
Design presentations often generate subjective stakeholder opinions that lead to many revisions and unclear decisions. Social dynamics cause attendees to contribute for alignment, turning a single offhand comment into cascading edits and uncontrolled feedback. Presentations should be treated as business cases that start with context and research, present usability findings and A/B results, and conclude with insight, design, and business impact. Tying design choices to research shifts conversations from stylistic preferences to trade-offs, reduces rework, accelerates approvals, and produces designs that reflect real user needs. A repeatable, evidence-driven framework enables consistent, practical stakeholder meetings.
Read at LogRocket Blog
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]