#breach-of-contract

#breach-of-contract

Michael's claims Geffen violated an 'oral contract' that promised financial support and an equal share of money and property, now challenged amid their divorce.

Charles Samek KC asserted that the government’s claims represent mere 'buyer’s remorse', failing to meet the proof standard for their £122 million breach of contract claim.

"We reiterate that this is not a First Amendment case; it is a breach of contract case. Wax's efforts to characterize it otherwise are of no avail."