#judicial-review

#judicial-review

Oregon has concluded that children for whom it is responsible should be placed only with adults who promise to respect the gender identity of the child as the child gets older and develops such identity. ... As a result, Oregon requires a commitment from a prospective foster parent, before that person is given custody of a child for whom Oregon is responsible, that the applicant will not act contrary to the child's interest. Bates refused to make that commitment.

Camden resident Blessing Olubanjo aims to have pedestrian crossings removed, arguing they infringe on her Christian rights and constitute unlawful political messaging.

The two fathers, Will Orr-Ewing and Pete Montgomery, argue that smartphones are being used dangerously in schools, citing issues like cyberbullying and access to harmful content.

According to Daniel Jacobson, Congress appropriated very specific pots of money for foreign assistance purposes in 2024 and mandated the executive branch to use the full amount.

Claire Welsby, a campaigner, said: "There are lots of things we would look at and we would focus on the process. But also, we will continue to hold them to account, through freedom of information requests, continuing to go to public meetings, and continuing to hold protests."

Texas law permits capital murder convictions for those involved in a felony during which deaths occur. However, to impose the death penalty, intent must be established.

There was nothing natural about the way my son died. Balram died because of a series of clear, documented, and avoidable clinical failures.

The High Court granted DART+ West permission to proceed after two businesses withdrew their judicial reviews, important for the project's next steps towards expansion.

Without a regulated private healthcare service, trans youngsters in the UK would be forced either to endure the years-long waiting times at regional hubs.

Khalil's attorneys argue that the charge against him was a retaliatory measure stemming from his advocacy. We will continue to fight for his release.

Strunsky highlighted that the investigative report's reliance on uncorroborated claims from anonymous sources severely undermines its credibility and objectivity, raising concerns about its findings.

The district court considered that Thompson is transgender, autistic, and has suffered prior trauma in her life. However, personal characteristics should not solely dictate sentencing.

The university's decision to suspend admissions to 18 degree programs has sparked a judicial review application, citing the need for the senate's involvement in academic matters.

This judicial review provides at least a small reprieve, hope that some of the administration's most destructive impulses will be stopped.

The Dedham Vale Society and Campaign for National Parks successfully challenged a planning decision that failed to conserve and enhance protected national landscapes.

The Tenth Circuit's extreme deference to arbitrators has nullified meaningful judicial review, as emphasized in the amicus brief by Lift Our Voices. The brief cites the court's admissions of powerlessness, claiming federal courts "do not have discretion," "do not have power," and "cannot set aside an arbitration award based on legal error." This language reflects a worrying abdication of judicial authority outlined in Article III when the Federal Arbitration Act was enacted.

"This unprecedented increase in government roles raises serious concerns about whether such appointments are genuinely reflective of democratic principles and equality in representation."

"It is not too late for Labour to register the hurt that this cruel policy has caused, step back from picking the pockets of pensioners and do the right thing."